English is the unofficial language of
the United States, although recently 'Progressives' in the central
federal government (and some state governments) have an agenda to make it bilingual with Spanish as
the secondary language through Progressive social engineering. It is instituted by only offering Spanish in the educational system, deleting choice, and demanding that two years of a foreign language (in this case, Spanish) be a prerequisite for a college/university degree. Devious, to say the least. The educational system has the funds for sports and progressive curriculum, but not for offering language courses other than Spanish. Traditionally, German and French were included in the curriculum. At the rate of the growth of Chinese influence and subversion, that may include the Chinese language; and the agenda of Islamic global theocracy, Arabic may be also included.
That agenda is not popular with the people, at least for the generation that has not been fully indoctrinated, not coinciding with the Founders' dream of a constitutional republic that is based upon individual liberty, yet unifies without collectivism through respect of liberties and rights of others as well as the tried-and-proven international concept of the 'Golden Rule'. Multiculturalism does not promote nor maintain national unity. However, immigrated intellectual thought and free thinking can be beneficial.
Canada became bilingual between French and English because of regions being separated from the French and English settlers that founded that nation; and its negative results can be seen. The Balkans is another example. By turning the United States into bilingual, English/Spanish, it sours the concept of being 'united' and endangers its sovereignty.
That agenda is not popular with the people, at least for the generation that has not been fully indoctrinated, not coinciding with the Founders' dream of a constitutional republic that is based upon individual liberty, yet unifies without collectivism through respect of liberties and rights of others as well as the tried-and-proven international concept of the 'Golden Rule'. Multiculturalism does not promote nor maintain national unity. However, immigrated intellectual thought and free thinking can be beneficial.
Canada became bilingual between French and English because of regions being separated from the French and English settlers that founded that nation; and its negative results can be seen. The Balkans is another example. By turning the United States into bilingual, English/Spanish, it sours the concept of being 'united' and endangers its sovereignty.
In another aspect, French was once the diplomatic language, but that has been replaced with English in a world that once Latin was the established language to unite people linguistically (and culturally).
While English is spoken in the United States, it is not the same English spoken in the United Kingdom, which has evolved from Middle English, which evolved from Old English that was instituted from the Anglo-Saxons whose language came from Germania and Old Norse, which is part of the Indo-European group of languages of western civilization.
Anglo-Saxon Rune |
In what is now called the United
Kingdom, its original language was Celtic (Irish, Welsh, and Scottish
Gaelic), until the Romans came and established Latin, which is part
of the Italic language group of French, Italian, Spanish, and
Romanian dialects.
The Germanic languages, the Slavic languages
(Russian and Polish), the Baltic languages (Lithuanian and Latvian),
and the Indo-Iranian languages (Persian and Hindi) derive from the
biblical Hittites who also spoke an Indo-European language. Extinct
Indo-European family of languages are: Phrygian, Lycian, Thracian,
Illyrian, Macedonian, Tocharian and others. Asian and Arabic language/dialects are in a class of its own - those written languages being a unique art form.
Latin |
Arabic |
Japanese |
Here is an example of the similarities
of the Indo-European languages by using the modern English word,
father:
Old English = fæder
Latin = pater
Greek = patèr
Sanskrit = pitá
The change of
the Germanic language from Latin is, for example, that f
has been replaced with p
from the Latin. The transition is called Grimm's
Law, named after Jacob
Grimm (Brothers
Grimm) who was a linguist and folklorist of Germania. [Grimm
Fairy Tales]
Without getting
into the detailed schematics of the difference between Old, Middle,
and New (modern) English one can readily recognize the evolving
process when examining text. Three vowels in the inflectional endings
of Old English words were reduced to one in Middle English, and then
the inflectional endings disappeared in the modern age. Primarily the
rules of spelling changed – and changing again for English spoken
in the United States after the American Revolution and Independence
as a sovereign nation of united colonies turned states. Thus, the American English is not the same written English of the colonial period, just as dialects evolved in the Southern states, Northeastern and other regions.
The cultural
language evolved again as slang words and phrases were introduced and
cemented in posterity within the Webster/American dictionaries.
Indeed, a completely separate dictionary was published just for slang
English.
New England Primer |
Even today,
English spelling in the United Kingdom is different than the American
English, with examples like defense being spelled defence in UK, et
cetera (Latin derivative). Both UK and American English have adopted
words and phrases from French and Latin, such as: coup
de etát
and et cetera
[abbreviated as etc].
Words like militia
and service
are derived from Latin. Early English used the phonetics of
Anglo-Saxon which the Latin
alphabet did not offer.
Nordic Rune - Old Norse |
The Vikings
spoke Old Norse,
which was introduced to Old English during the Viking (Norse) Golden
Age in history. Old Norse words adopted
into and influenced the English language are many, sky,
leg,
they,
and are
would be a few examples. Just as modern English developed dialects,
as in the United States (difference in regions, like South and
Northeast); Old English producing dialects: Mercian, Northumbrian,
Kentish, and West Saxon.
Before the
introduction of the Latin alphabet, Old English used the runic
alphabet like the Norse did.
Sentences and
their structure have grown complex in Modern English as can seen in
Old English and Old Norse. An example is taken from the opening lines
of the poem Beowulf.
Hwæt! Wē Gār-Dena in geār-dagum = What! We of Gare-Danes in yore-days.
The differences
can be seen when examining American colonial text to American text
written sometime in the late 18th
century and early 19th
century after independence.
J.
R. R. Tolkien used Old English
text to create language that imitated Anglo-Saxon/Norse runic
alphabet and used it for creating an Elven/Elvish
language in his Lord
of the Rings tales.
Elvish Rune |
All during this
evolving of the English language, primarily insituted and maintained
in the United States, the art form of linguistics and the
intellectual aspect of language has become lost; especially in the
process of constantly including slang in American dictionaries that
we are losing something special. Indeed, the American educational
system is overseen by those that create new methods of education just
to change and not for any intellectual reason; thus creating a
society and its subsequent generations that no longer have the
intellectual ability to converse and relay creative thinking. That
phenomenon has been created by those who are intent upon changing the
United States, not just to be unique, but to change the political
form of our government that was established as a constitutional
republic. Change can be disconcerting, but it is the detail of that
change that should be what we are concerned about.
As my father
used to say, “Don't fix something if it is not broken”.
New descriptive
words are bound to appear as inventions and technical progress
requires those changes, but setting aside that necessity, one wonders
if we have not lost something important by not sticking to the
“Queen's English” from the period known as the Victorian era - the dawn of great invention, industrial age, and seekers of technology.
Keeping things
into the basics of simplicity is a fine thing, but not to the point
where we curse future generations with 'dumb-down' education which
eventually a tyrant government of the state uses to control the
populace and thus inhibits and destroys the greatness of a
civilization.
Technology has also polluted the written language in the form of handwriting. Once handwriting was important and the endeavor for good penmanship was key to correspondence. The art of penmanship is becoming extinct, not emphasized as it was decades ago. Indeed, texting has taken the place of conversation, further degrading personal interaction and the art of intellect. It is going beyond convenience that is creating a society of distant, impersonal, and callous relationship. Yet, through the Internet it has also made the world smaller where people of various nations can interact with little language barrier thanks to electronic translation. The 'Babel' effect has been reduced, at least in written languages. Technology may someday create a device that can translate languages in personal communication between people in audio form.
Technology and change in societies has its share of progress, but it also loses the eccense of what makes a successful and great society.
All of this reflective thought may become moot because homo sapiens seem to allow the corruption of power and the schematics of religious fervor end up destroying the world that has evolved, but has not learned to live in coexistence; and not because of lingustic differences.
Technology has also polluted the written language in the form of handwriting. Once handwriting was important and the endeavor for good penmanship was key to correspondence. The art of penmanship is becoming extinct, not emphasized as it was decades ago. Indeed, texting has taken the place of conversation, further degrading personal interaction and the art of intellect. It is going beyond convenience that is creating a society of distant, impersonal, and callous relationship. Yet, through the Internet it has also made the world smaller where people of various nations can interact with little language barrier thanks to electronic translation. The 'Babel' effect has been reduced, at least in written languages. Technology may someday create a device that can translate languages in personal communication between people in audio form.
Technology and change in societies has its share of progress, but it also loses the eccense of what makes a successful and great society.
All of this reflective thought may become moot because homo sapiens seem to allow the corruption of power and the schematics of religious fervor end up destroying the world that has evolved, but has not learned to live in coexistence; and not because of lingustic differences.
Problematic,
indeed.
No comments:
Post a Comment