Friday, January 29, 2010

Graphic: The Democrat Party Says "HELL, NO!" To REAL Energy Independence

democrat party says hell no to real energy independenceBaby steps in the right direction.
 Click image to enlarge.
By Steve Everley on January 28, 2010 
Yesterday, Senators Jim Webb (D-VA) and Mark Warner (D-VA) wrote a stinging letter to Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar over his most recent delay on offshore drilling, this time for an area off the coast of Virginia estimated to have 130 million barrels of oil and over one trillion cubic feet of natural gas.

The announcement of delay against which the Virginia Senators are arguing came from the Minerals Management Service in a meeting that was behind closed doors and off limits to the press.

By Bruce Allen
Heritage Foundation
Abstract: Conventional wisdom holds that offshore oil and gas production harms the surrounding environment. This blanket "wisdom" ignores the fact that the largest source of marine hydrocarbon pollution is offshore natural oil seepage. It also ignores the fact that offshore oil production has lowered the amount of oil released into the ocean by reducing natural oil seepage, especially in areas with active offshore oil seeps, such as California's Santa Barbara coast. This Heritage Foundation analysis cites studies, developments, and biological facts that demonstrate often-overlooked benefits of offshore oil and gas production.

Slow-Walking U.S. Energy Security  

Investor's Business Daily
Energy: Interior Secretary Ken Salazar announced Monday that his agency would look into drilling for oil in the Atlantic soon. It sounds good. But a glimpse at the strategy suggests Salazar's real aim is to block drilling.

Thursday, January 28, 2010

Spanking the Supreme Court

spanking the supreme court
During the State of the Union address, President Obama shamefully scolded the Supreme Court judges on the floor of the House for upholding freedom of speech. 

Barack Obama vs The Supreme Court
Kevin Mooney
The American Spectator

He really did not like that ruling in defense of First Amendment freedoms did he?  Has a president ever attacked The U.S. Supreme Court like that in such an august setting? Already, Fox News and CNN have made note of Justice Alito's lip movements that seem to say "not true." - A bit more reverential than Rep. Joe Wilson's editorial comments.

Click image to enlarge.

Open Letter to Glenn Beck from Charles Kerchner, Cmdr. USNR (Retired)

open letter to glenn beck from charles kerchner cmdr usnr retiredDear Glenn Beck:

Glenn, you say you have studied the founders and framers of our U.S. Constitution to try to learn more about the original intent and meanings of the words therein.

I Believe The Fix Was In for the 2008 Election and The Cover Up is Still Going Strong and Has Created The Perfect Storm for a Constitutional Crisis!

Glenn, when are you going to read the preeminent legal treatise of the time of the Revolutionary War against Great Britain that was used by the founders to write the Declaration of Independence and the framers to craft our U.S. Constitution? Benjamin Franklin referred to it as being in heavy use and demand by the delegates at the Continental Congress in 1775 when four copies were sent to him by Dumas, who published a newly edited edition in 1775. It was written in French, the diplomatic language of the time, of which Franklin and many others who founded our nation were fluent in, as well as English.

The term, "Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness," is a direct quote from this book. And there are many more quotes from it in our Declaration of Independence and Constitution. And this book is even mentioned by name in Article I, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution.

This book was the legal reference book describing a new form of government for governing a Constitutional Republic with a written Constitution, which George Washington had on his desk and was observed reading from on his first day in office in New York, and it was the legal book John Jay had on his desk as the 1st Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court. John Jay's letter to George Washington is the reason the legal term of art from that legal book is in Article II of the U.S. Constitution as to the eligibility requirements to be President.

The name of the book is, "The Law of Nations or Principles of Natural Law", by Vattel. I recommend you read it. If you don't have time to read it all, read at least Volume 1. And if you don't have time to read that, then read Vol.1, Chapter 19, Section 212, on the natural law definitions of "Citizenship" and the separate meaning and definition of the legal term of art "natural born Citizen".

The question for constitutional standards regarding Obama is not whether he is a Citizen of the U.S., but whether he is a "natural born Citizen" of the U.S. to Constitutional standards, as envisioned by the founders and framers of the Constitution, and reiterated in four U.S. Supreme Court decisions over the next 100 years of this nation until the progressive movement started to blur those two terms in the eyes and minds of the American people so their political party can put forward and elect anyone to the office of President and Commander in Chief (CINC) of our military. The President and CINC per the founders intent must have sole allegiance at birth to only the USA with no citizenship at birth from his parents in any other nation. That is a "natural born Citizen," citizenship at birth in only the USA. He must be born in the USA to two Citizens of the USA to achieve natural born Citizenship and sole allegiance at birth. Obama was born with dual-citizenship. He was not eligible per the founders intent. But the Progressive movement has convinced People otherwise. And you are helping them with their cover up.

Read Vattel's, "The Law of Nations or Principles of Natural Law", Vol. 1, Chapter 19, Section 212. This is natural law given to nature from God. Pray on it. Then speak the truth from the heart. Speak truth to power. You have the ability to save the Constitution and the Republic. Please speak up on the true meaning of "natural born Citizen" and educate the People on the difference between born Citizen, naturalized Citizen, and "natural born Citizen."

Reference:  Citizenship Terms Used in the US Constitution

I am a Son of the American Revolution. I served my country in the military for 33 years on active duty and reserves. I took an oath to support and defend the Constitution, not to defend a President or a man.

Please read this book and then speak out about it on your shows.

Charles Kerchner
Commander USNR (Retired)

Guest article printed with permission from the author.

Obama Demonizes Banks and Financial Institutions

Washington Times
New taxes are based on bad politics and stupid economics

President Obama has decided to take on the banking industry with the most intrusive regulatory and tax package since the new deal of the 1930s. If the president's failed freshman year didn't convince the O Force of his own fallibility, confronting Wall Street should bring him back down to Earth.

Click image to enlarge.  Also available as a pdf on Scribd.

Wednesday, January 27, 2010

Graphic: Ken Salazar The Energy Czar

ken salazar the energy czar
Investor's Business Daily
Posted 01/26/2010 07:10 PM ET

Energy: Interior Secretary Ken Salazar announced Monday that his agency would look into drilling for oil in the Atlantic soon. It sounds good. But a glimpse at the strategy suggests Salazar's real aim is to block drilling.  

Related story:

Interior Department talking up America's offshore wind potential

Interior Secretary Ken Salazar is actively touting the U.S. offshore wind-power potential, saying at a stop in New Jersey that if fully developed off the East Coast wind generation could produce enough electricity to replace most coal-fired power plants.

Click image to enlarge.

Sunday, January 24, 2010

Obama Administration Anonymously Infiltrating Blogs?

Your tax dollars are at work stifling freedom of speech and disseminating propaganda through the internet to protect Obama.

Obama confidant's spine-chilling proposal
Cass Sunstein has long been one of Barack Obama's closest confidants. Often mentioned as a likely Obama nominee to the Supreme Court, Sunstein is currently Obama's head of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs where, among other things, he is responsible for "overseeing policies relating to privacy, information quality, and statistical programs." In 2008, while at Harvard Law School, Sunstein co-wrote a truly pernicious paper proposing that the U.S. Government employ teams of covert agents and pseudo-"independent" advocates to "cognitively infiltrate" online groups and websites -- as well as other activist groups -- which advocate views that Sunstein deems "false conspiracy theories" about the Government.  This would be designed to increase citizens' faith in government officials and undermine the credibility of conspiracists.

Sunstein advocates that the Government's stealth infiltration should be accomplished by sending covert agents into "chat rooms, online social networks, or even real-space groups." He also proposes that the Government make secret payments to so-called "independent" credible voices to bolster the Government's messaging (on the ground that those who don't believe government sources will be more inclined to listen to those who appear independent while secretly acting on behalf of the Government). This program would target those advocating false "conspiracy theories," which they define to mean: "an attempt to explain an event or practice by reference to the machinations of powerful people, who have also managed to conceal their role."

Cass Sunstein's "solution" for "conspiracy theorists":

Governmental Responses
What can government do about conspiracy theories? Among the things it can do, what should it do? We can readily imagine a series of possible responses. (1) Government might ban conspiracy theorizing. (2) Government might impose some kind of tax, financial or otherwise, on those who disseminate such theories. (3) Government might itself engage in counterspeech, marshaling arguments to discredit conspiracy theories. (4) Government might formally hire credible private parties to engage in counterspeech. (5) Government might engage in informal communication with such parties, encouraging them to help. Each instrument has a distinctive set of potential effects, or costs and benefits, and each will have a place under imaginable conditions. However, our main policy idea is that government should engage in cognitive infiltration of the groups that produce conspiracy theories, which involves a mix of (3), (4) and (5).

So, has the Obama administration put Cas Sunstein's ideas to work?  You decide.

The Most Transparent Administration Ever?  Not at DOJ
Hans von Spakovsky
National Review Online
DoJ hires bloggers as propagandists and sock puppets
Clarice Feldman
Ellie Light:  Obama Astroturfer?

One "conspiracy theory" the Obama administration is definitely trying to squelch concerns his eligibility to serve as President.  Obama holds dual citizenship with the U.K. through his father, and therefore does not qualify as an Article II, Sec. 1 "natural born Citizen".  Also see these four graphics:  "Natural Born Citizen", "Citizen vs Natural Born Citizen", "Obama is a Usurper", "Obama: A Constitutional Crisis", and "Who Is Obama, The Chameleon?"

With the eager help of the left-wing media, and some apparent complicity with the RNC because of John McCain's eligibility status, Obama and his team have painted anyone who questions the definition of that term as a conspiratorial birther.  Furthermore, Obama enjoys the services provided by bloggers (probably paid) to infiltrate conservative blogs that push for full disclosure from the President.  The following article received comments from an Obama acolyte.  Paid or otherwise, we call commenters like him obots.

In the next article you will meet smrstrauss, who attempts to spread disinformation about Obama's eligibility in the comment section of the blog.  Also, if you do a keyword search for that username, you will find a large number of similar comments made by him across the conservative blogosphere.  He has spent an inordinate amount of time blogging on this issue.  One blogger claimed to have outed smrstrauss on  He had this to say about him:

"With a little bit of work, I was able to find out this O-bot was likely Obama Superdelegate from DC, Shadow Senator Paul Strauss."

If this blogger is correct, his discovery raises an important question:  Has this person been paid with tax dollars to spread disinformation and propaganda?

Here's the article:
Quo Warranto to Remove Obama From Office (view comment on 11/29/09 at 12:18 PM)
Erica at Jefferson's Rebels

Obama is a Coward
Click image to enlarge.

The Face of Modern-Day Slavery

Faces of Slavery from David Hepburn on Vimeo.

Video appears on the website of  This organization is attempting to find solutions to modern-day slavery.  If you want to know more and take a pro-active role in reducing human trafficking, then this is a good place to start.

Americans are rightfully ashamed of our own history in the slave trade, and of course there are many who will never let us forget and move forward.  Indeed, some have made an industry, others a religion, out of racially dividing America.

However, for those who only want to focus on slavery in America, I would like to direct your attention to an article by Howard Dodson titled Slavery in the Twenty-First Century.  Dodson is an African-American  "lecturer, educator and consultant, is Chief of the Schomburg Center for Research in Black Culture of The New York Public Library and a specialist in African-American history. He is a former member of the President’s Commission on the National Museum of African American History and Culture and serves on the Scientific and Technical Committee of the UNESCO Slave Route project."  Dodson attempts to raise awareness, and he calls his kinsmen to action [emphasis mine]:
The slave trade is back in full force. This modern slave trade, however, is not limited to just young Africans; women and children are also being enslaved in almost every continent. It is estimated that there are over 27 million enslaved persons worldwide, more than double the number of those who were deported in the 400-year history of the transatlantic slave trade to the Americas. What is remarkable is that this unprecedented trafficking largely goes unnoticed. The 27 million victims of the modern slave trade are more invisible to the world’s eye than were the 10 million to 12 million Africans who were forcibly sent to the Americas during the sixteenth through the nineteenth centuries. How do we account for this fact in this age of media and communications overload and transparency?

Since varying forms of modern slavery exist in every society and major community worldwide, persons who would become twenty-first-century abolitionists are obliged to call upon Governments, religious bodies and citizens to launch investigations and convene hearings on the status of slavery and slave trafficking. The existence of millions of enslaved persons around the world challenges us to create a global abolitionist movement. Among the first to join should be those who benefited from the successful movements that ended the transatlantic slave trade and slavery in the Americas. I, for one, have signed up.

The U.S. Department of State annually produces a report on slavery.  The latest Trafficking in Persons Report 2009 details human trafficking activity around the world.  A few quoted excerpts from the report are below.  In addition to these excerpts, readers are reminded that Jefferson's Rebels published an article, Sexual Depravity Breeds Savage Jihadists, which dovetails with the evidence presented in this report.  Also see Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's introductory remarks to the report.  If you are curious about slavery in countries not listed here, please turn to the full report above.

Saturday, January 23, 2010

Pre-State-of-the-Union Essay

 On Thursday, November 5th, 2009 a US Army psychiatrist killed 13 and wounded 30 others at Fort HoodTexas in an event is now referred to as the Fort Hood Massacre. Major Nidal Malki Hasan, 39, a Muslim, used two handguns and during the process received gunshot wounds from those that tried to stop his Islamic fanatic killing spree.

It soon hit the news media that a military post in the United States had suffered the attack of Islamic Fascism, a terrorist attack, within their ranks. Shocking, but not unique, another attack by a US military Muslim soldier upon fellow troops had also occurred at Camp PennsylvaniaKuwait in June of 2008; however that incident was not coordinated with organized Islamic extremists. In that incident one soldier, a US Army officer, died and fifteen others were injured. It was claimed by Sgt Hasan Akbar’s father that his son was the only African American and only Muslim in his company was out of resentment. In that case a hand grenade was used.

Friday, January 22, 2010

STAND UP: Silent no more...By Thomas S Schmitz

It’s us vs. them. There I said it. The war between the silent majority and intellectual imperialism has officially begun. God help us. It began on September 3 2008 when Sarah Louise Heath Palin walked onto the stage in Saint Paul Minnesota to accept the Republican Party nomination for vice president. In that instant the massed mouths of America hit the floor. Some jaws hit the floor because of intellectual disdain, yet many more jaws hit the floor for quite a different reason. On that stage stood a living, breathing, walking and talking affront to the dangerous progressive ideals of the self anointed brainy and cerebral left. Sarah Palin took the offense and instantly became our warrior, an effective thorn in the side of the pretentiously puffed up liberals. She proved that women didn’t have to divorce their husbands and have abortions to be successful. She spoke our language, she inspired us that all was not lost; she gave us hope, she was a populist and showed our own that we finally had adequate representation for the first time since Ronald Reagan.

Who is the silent majority? As Sarah said in Saint Paul, “They are the ones who do some of the hardest work in America ... who grow our food, run our factories, and fight our wars “. I’ll take it a step farther, the silent majority did not attend Harvard, Princeton or Yale ( the original Axis of Evil ) and we don’t drink lattes, have colonics, “ do lunch “, pay someone to walk our dog, or frighten our children with “green” anti-capitalist environmental propaganda. We say our prayers at night, get up in the morning, go about our day, run our errands, and are proud to contribute to free market American individualism. We don’t read “self help” books about the power of persuasion and we don’t care what Oprah thinks. We try hard to solve our problems on our own. We care for and raise our families very nicely without the learned experience of nannies, birthing specialists, life coaches or surrogates.

On July 26 2009 the silent majority received an important message which resonated deeply within each of us when Sarah Palin beat the democrats at their own game by transferring power to Lt. Governor Sean Parnell. Sarah said, “it may be tempting and more comfortable to just keep your head down, plod along, and appease those who demand: “Sit down and shut up”, but that's the worthless, easy path; that's a quitter's way out. And a problem in our country today is apathy. It would be apathetic to just hunker down and “go with the flow”. Nah, only dead fish “go with the flow”. Then came healthcare and America got a shocking glimpse at the blatant authoritarian agenda of this administration. Yet something wonderful and very American happened. We saw Sarah Palin’s inspirational words come to action in August as thousands upon thousands of regular everyday citizens flocked to town hall meetings, intent to loudly raise their previously ignored voices of opposition to their out of touch lordly representatives.

And so the sleeping giant has been awakened. Phase two of this war begins. One million patriots marched on Washington DC on September 12 2009 to protest big government. The cavalry has arrived. Sarah Palin has united the conservative American populate. The timing could not be more crucial to our republic. As the intentionally hypnotic and deceptive charm of President Barack Obama is rapidly fading into redundancy, his true colors are beginning to show. The intellectual lefts oppressive agenda can no longer be hidden behind his flashing smile and bogus centrism. Yes the sleeping giant has been awakened just in time to see that this creepy new emperor has no clothes.

Thomas S Schmitz
Team Sarah

Originally published November 1 2009 in The Team Sarah Conservative Voice

Thursday, January 21, 2010

Raping America

Grac-Marie Turner
January 21, 2010
National Review Online
raping americaThe American people have been saying every way they can for a year that they are frightened about what President Obama’s health overhaul — and his entire liberal agenda — would do to America, to our prosperity, and to our freedom.
Click image to enlarge.  Also available on Scribd as a pdf. 

What Scott Brown's Victory Means

It is true that the victory of Scott Brown versus Martha Coakley in Massachusetts is literally historic, after someone other than a Democrat now sits in the Senate seat that once belonged to Edward Kennedy who kept that seat from 1962 until his death in 2009.
Of course, the Internet and news media is buzzing about this landmark political win in a state that is considered a solid “blue” Democrat state, but what is the real message here?
The message here is that those of the Obama Nation membership are finding out that Tea Party protestors and citizens exercising their liberties as well as telling ALL politicians that the grassroot Americans don’t want the push for a Nanny State and want the Jeffersonian Republic back. They are tired of footing the bill for a runaway deficit, forced to pay high taxes used for special interestsvote buyingnon-transparent governmentbig government spendingmisappropriation of fundsusing tax funds for charity[*] and the disrespect of constitutional law and the American people.
Indeed, during Clinton’s administration, he publicly implied that the American people couldn’t handle the responsibility of their own retirement fund program, so wouldn’t agree to side with the idea of slowly turning the dysfunctional Social Security and immigration program over to the hands of the individual citizens, if they so choose.
The Obama Nation crowd is no different, they are worse.

Wednesday, January 20, 2010

Who Is Barack Obama, The Chameleon?

who is barack obama the chameleon
Click image to enlarge.  Also available on Scribd as a pdf.

These questions will NOT go away until we get honest answers!

The mainstream media has abysmally failed the American public, and are unwittingly responsible for the birth of the blogosphere.

Graphic: Palin Says "We Need Smaller, Smarter Government"

sarah palin says we need smaller smarter governmentClick image to enlarge.  Also available on Scribd as a pdf.

Gov. Palin was interviewed by Greta Van Sustern on Fox News on January 19, 2010, following the historic election of Scott Brown of Massachusetts to replace Sen. Ted Kennedy.  Sarah's simple words during that conversation expressed the core issues most Americans have with our present government.  We're now intending to refound our Republic.

Are you with us?

Press Release: Kerchner v Obama & Congress - U.S. 3rd Circut Appeal - Appellants Opening Brief - Filed 19 Jan 2010

 For Immediate Release - 19 January 2010

Kerchner v Obama & Congress - U.S. 3rd Circuit Appeal - Appellant's Opening Brief - Filed 19 Jan 2010

Attorney Mario Apuzzo has filed the Appellant's Opening Brief in the Kerchner et al v Obama et al lawsuit Appeal. The Brief was filed with the U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia PA on 19 Jan 2010. See this link to download a copy and read it:

Attorney Apuzzo will comment on this action more in the next few days in his legal blog at:  However, please feel free to contact Atty Apuzzo with any immediate questions at the contact addresses listed in the afore listed blog site.

We look forward to the U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals reviewing this matter and ordering a trial on the merits as to the Article II Constitutional eligibility of Obama to serve as President and Commander-in-Chief of the military.

We say Obama is not a "natural born Citizen" of the USA and thus is not eligible to serve in the Oval Office. Obama is a Usurper and must be removed to preserve the integrity and fundamental law of our Constitution and our Republic.

"We the People" will be heard on this matter! As the People in Massachusetts have demonstrated, "We the People" are the Sovereigns in this country and the Constitution is the fundamental law of our nation, not Obama or Congress. We will not be silenced.  The chair Obama sits in in the Oval Office is not his throne. It is the People's seat too.  And Obama despite all his obfuscations to date must prove to Constitutional standards that he is eligible to sit in that seat.

This is not going to go away until Obama stops hiding ALL his hidden and sealed early life documents and provides original copies of them to a controlling legal authority and reveals his true legal identity from the time he was born until the time he ran for President. Obama at birth was born British and a dual-citizen. He holds and has held multiple citizenships during his life-time. He's a Citizenship chameleon as the moment and time in his life suited him and he is not a "natural born Citizen" with singular and sole allegiance and Citizenship at birth to the USA as is required per the Constitution per the intent of our founders and the meaning of the term "natural born Citizen" to Constitutional standards.

Charles F. Kerchner, Jr.
Commander USNR (Retired)
Lead Plaintiff
Kerchner v Obama & Congress

Click image to enlarge -->
Also available on Scribd as a pdf.

Bubble World, Washington, D.C.

bubble world washington d.c.

What else would you expect from Democrat politicans? We, the independent voters of America, have only just begun.  We're  going to burst the Democrats' bubble in 2010 and 2012.

Thanks, Massachusetts voters!  Count Barney Franks among the next political casualties.

Tuesday, January 19, 2010

Victory! Welcome Sen. Scott Brown To The People's Seat!

victory welcome scott brown to the people's seat
 Click image to enlarge. Also available on Scribd as a pdf.

Brown Beats Coakley in Massachusetts Senate Race

In a victory few thought possible just a month ago, Republican Scott Brown defeated Democrat Martha Coakley Tuesday in the race for the U.S. Senate seat formerly held by Ted Kennedy -- a win that could grind President Obama's agenda to a halt and portend huge losses for Democrats in the November midterms.

Obama, Pelosi, Reid, and the rest of the Democrats in Congress.  You're next!

28th Amendment: Congress shall make no law that applies to the citizens of the United States that does not apply equally to the Senators or Representatives

congress shall make no law that applies to the citizens of the united states that does not apply equally to the senators or representatives, ConstitutionCongress shall make no law that applies to the citizens of the United States that does not apply equally to the Senators or Representatives, and Congress shall make no law that applies to the Senators or Representatives that does not apply equally to the citizens of the United States.

Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-NC 5th District) suggested this idea, for a 28th amendment to the Constitution, in a letter to President Obama, Sen. Richard Burr, and Sen. Kay Hagan on November 10, 2009.

Sounds like a fabulous idea, so I say, keep the message viral until we elect a more balanced Congress in 2010.  This proposal will never be addressed by this Congress so long as Democrats control all three bodies of our government.

Click here to read the official process for proposing an amendment to the Constitution.
The Constitution provides that an amendment may be proposed either by the Congress with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate or by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the State legislatures. None of the 27 amendments to the Constitution have been proposed by constitutional convention. 
Caution:  Other 28th Amendment proposals are floating around on the internet, so do not sign a petition unless you have read it thoroughly.  Some call for direct democracy, which is what every socialist/marxist/communist wants. Again, caution!

Bowing Down Has a Price

Click image to enlarge.
Mr. Obama, you and your party have enraged average Americans.  Whether or not the Democrats lose the Senate seat held by the late Ted Kennedy, make no mistake -- your name was on the ticket alongside Martha Coakley's, and will be on every ballot in the 2010 election.  We have only just begun to fight your monstrous ideology with our votes and what's left of the change in our pockets.

The following article by James Lewis appeared today in American Thinker.

Obama showed the world how far he is from JFK's liberalism when he bowed down ostentatiously to two monarchs in a row --- the Saudi King, whose tribal kingdom confines women to the home, protects African slavery, and executes homosexuals; and the Emperor of Japan, in whose father's name Japanese soldiers massacred racially "inferior" Asians throughout the "Greater Asian Co-Prosperity Sphere." Naturally the Chinese, who still hate the Japanese for what they did, simply went ballistic when Obama bowed to the Japanese Emperor.  A month later China torpedoed the Copenhagen summit with exquisite timing, right after Obama invested his personal prestige in rescuing the Great Green Fraud of Eurosocialism. You can bet that the Chinese did that deliberately. It was payback, and it also protected their own economic development and their investment in US Treasuries.

On the other side of the world, Obama likes to show public contempt for the Brits, who are the source of American ideals of liberty. It was the Royal Navy that halted the African slave trade, if only belatedly, and it's Muslim Africans who still own black slaves today, two hundred years after the Brits swept slavery from the oceans. Just as it was Abe Lincoln, an American Republican, who ended slavery in America.

But mere facts don't mean diddly to the Left.

Monday, January 18, 2010

An Open Letter to Google's Censorship Team

Let me be blunt. Google censors political speech.

The world has known for some time that Google’s algorithm can be programmed to censor websites and keywords. Back in 2005, CNET claimed all its reporters were blacklisted for a year for posting information about your CEO Eric Schmidt -- information that was publicly available through Google’s own search engine.

On a grander scale, Google also proved its willingness to censor political speech when it set up shop in China, although now your company is threatening to pull out because of cyberattacks on your infrastructure. Unsurprisingly, spying took place against human rights activists in China. Now you claim Google is “. . . no longer willing to continue censoring our results.” I hope that’s true, but I’m not convinced. Regardless of your initial “good intentions” in opening China to the world, dealing with communist dictators always leads to predictable results, so your corporate motto “Don’t Be Evil” has now been tarnished.

Google also supports censoring sites that criticize some Islamic beliefs and practices. In early 2006 Google removed several news sites from its news search engine because complaints were received about various articles that were critical of Islam. These included the New Media Journal, MichNews, and The Jawa Report. These sites remain accessible from Google's main search page, but apparently are no longer included in Google News. Google responded by saying "We do not allow articles and sources expressly promoting hate speech viewpoints in Google News, although referencing hate speech for commentary and analysis is acceptable". So, Google admits to being the arbiter of what is and isn’t hate speech. Therefore, we must assume your company’s views are in line with European thoughts and laws concerning censorship. You are willing practitioners.

Unfortunately, there is plenty of hate in the world. I personally despise the venom spewed by Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and his ilk, Islamo-fascists like the Muslim cleric who debated Wafa Sultan (here, here, and here), skinheads, and communist dictators like Hugo Chavez to name a few. Has Google censored any of their speech? Only Google knows the answer.

In truth, and as much as I am offended by the speech of the aforementioned people, there is strategic value in hearing their hateful words. In The Art of War, Sun Tzu saidIf you know others and know yourself, you will not be imperiled in a hundred battles; if you do not know others but know yourself, you win one and lose one; if you do not know others and do not know yourself, you will be imperiled in every single battle.” I understand his remarks to mean we must know what our enemies think before we can know how to defeat them. Hiding our enemies words from us, imperils our safety.

A Plea for Unity, A Plea for Reformation on Martin Luther King's Day

I have informed fellow citizens of political parties, their platforms, their background, and this article will be about the New Black Panther Party whose platform, planks and racism hasn’t changed much from the ‘old’ Black Panther organization, as well as a plea to stop racism and instead promote unity through education and effort in the memory of a man who believed in unifed brotherhood.

First some background which takes us back into time …
January 18th is a Rev. Martin Luther King Day, a day set aside by the government to commemorate the life of the reformer by peaceful means, a major force in the civil rights movement of African Americans, and an ordained Christian minister. Martin Luther King was the hero of the civil rights movement whose results we see today, not because of his race or his skin pigmentation, but because of his message of peace between citizens of the United States.
But not all movements were peaceful.

Sunday, January 17, 2010

The Islamic Infiltration: Inside Our Government, Armed With Our Secrets

PJTV has produced a shocking series of videos about Islamic jihadism, and how terrorist front organizations like the Muslim Brotherhood and CAIR have infiltrated our government, as well as our universities and other parts of our society. If you believed our government has been protecting us, you will come away with a very different, and more frightening opinion, after watching this series of videos.

In the first video, The Islamic Infiltration, Part 1: Inside Our Government, Armed With Our Secrets, Bill Whittle interviews two whistleblowers, one a counter-terrorism offcial working with the Pentagon, and the other a former special agent with the FBI. These two men reveal that our government actually seeks the advice of these terrorist front organizations to discuss our strategies for fighting jihadists! That's like the police inviting Al Capone to the table to discuss strategies for fighting the mafia. This is flipping insane!

After watching Part 1, you will also want to view:

The Islamic Infiltration, Part 2: From Influence to Insurrection
The Face of Apostasy: Muslim-Born Author Dares to Publicly Criticize Islam
2009: A Deadly and Dangerous Year
Winning the Unwinnable War, Part 2: Can We Defeat The Jihad?
Winning the Unwinnable War: America's Response to Islamic Totalitarianism

Saturday, January 16, 2010

Please help the Haitians with Donations

"There but for the grace of God, go I."

The American Red Cross is asking for donations to help the earthquake victims of Haiti, so if you would like to extend a helping hand, you can arrange a donation here.

Return of the Rule of Law

Rule of law, according to a Wikipedia entry is …
also called supremacy of law, means that the law is above everyone and it applies to everyone. Whether governor or governed, rulers or ruled, no one is above the law, no one is exempted from the law, and no one can grant exemption to the application of the law. … The predominant view is that the concept of "rule of law" per se says nothing about the "justness" of the laws themselves, but simply how the legal system operates.[6][7]  As a consequence of this, a very undemocratic nation or one without respect for human rights can exist with a "rule of law"—a situation that may be occurring in several modern dictatorships. The "rule of law" or Rechtsstaat may be a necessary condition for democracy, but it is not a sufficient condition.[8]  … Aristotle endorsed the rule of law, writing that "law should govern", and those in power should be "servants of the laws."[10]  … In Islamic jurisprudence rule of law was formulated before the twelfth century, so that no official could claim to be above the law, not even the caliph.[12] However, this was not a reference to secular law, but to Islamic religious law in the form of Sharia law. In 1215 AD, a similar development occurred in England: King John placed himself and England's future sovereigns and magistrates at least partially within the rule of law, by signing Magna Carta.[13]  In 1776, the notion that no one is above the law was popular during the founding of the United States, for example Thomas Paine wrote in his pamphlet Common Sense "that in America, the law is king. For as in absolute governments the King is law, so in free countries the law ought to be king; and there ought to be no other."[15] In 1780, John Adams enshrined this principle in the Massachusetts Constitution by seeking to establish "a government of laws and not of men."[16]

The Radical Left's War On America

Click to visit the site and watch the video.

Friday, January 15, 2010

Congress Gone Wild

congress gone wildClick image to enlarge.

This image synthesizes the Democrat party under the leadership of Obama, Reid and Pelosi. Who will save America from the madness of these politicans?

Tell us: Are Your Paychecks Getting Smaller in 2010?

Someone close to me has just received his first paycheck for January 2010. He said his pay dropped about $140/month, but he won't know for certain until the next paycheck. Friends of his claim their paychecks have decreased $520 and $800 per month, respectively. Those sums of money are substantial for average Americans, who will likely be shocked that they now lack the money to make a car payment or pay other bills. This is a slippery slope to a new misery index. Obamacare and all the other madness enacted by this insane Congress will only make matters worse for average people. Never forget these words from Obama.

Below are past warnings.

Senator Obama's Four Tax Increases for People Earning Under $250k
IRS Tables May Cancel Obama Tax Cut

Watch your paychecks. If you notice them getting smaller due to taxation, post your thoughts here so that we can track the consequences of electing a Democrat congress and a Democrat President.

Thursday, January 14, 2010

Obama is a Coward!

obama is a coward
Click image to enlarge. Also available on Scribd as a pdf.

Obama's Presidential Eligibility Scandal?
Written by Zach Jones
Tuesday, 12 January 2010 News
Reprinted in full with permission.

[Ed. Note: For the record, while other lawsuits are cited in this article, I believe the only cases worth following at this time are those filed by Apuzzo, Donofrio & Pidgeon. ]

Did Hope for Rising GOP Stars like Bobby Jindal Play a Role in the Obama’s Presidential Eligibility Scandal?

When questions about Obama’s eligibility to serve as President arose, I immediately recognized that this could be the biggest political scandal in U.S. history, bigger even than Watergate. The allegations, if true, would have created widespread political turmoil and would have had to involve people, high up people, ignoring and/or covering up facts. How could a young Senator from Illinois have gotten so far, so quickly, in national politics without some in both the Democratic & Republican Parties taking notice, researching, discovering details of his past and recognizing that there was a BIG potential problem? Especially, given that every other person in Washington is a lawyer, people knew, the media had to have known, both of the problem and its ramifications. After all, it’s the political big league in Washington.

Having a legal background, I decided to do my own research to satisfy my curiosity and it became abundantly clear that legitimate questions existed and continue to exist. Questions regarding interpretation of Article II, Section I of the Constitution, questions of original intent, British/Kenyan law, acquisition of citizenship, questions about Obama’s birthplace, his adoption, his educational scholarships, his parent’s foreign allegiance/citizenship, his prior inadvertent admissions, questions about his passport(s), etc., exist with sufficient basis in law and/or fact to warrant serious investigation and judicial review. So, like many others at the time, I sat back and waited for the media firestorm to begin. And I waited, and waited, and waited. Not a peep from the media, Hillary, McCain or Republicans. Why?

Right-to-work Members Oppose Cadillac Tax on Health Care

Click image to enlarge.
Image by Erin Bonsteel

ALG Urges Right-to-Work Members of Congress to Oppose "Cadillac Tax" Health Care Penalty on Non-Union Workers
Written by ALG News
Thursday, 14 January 2010 13:32


Americans for Limited Government President Bill Wilson today in a letter urged members of Congress from 22 "right-to-work" states to oppose a 40 percent excise tax on non-union health care plans that "will hit your states and districts particularly hard, and is grossly unfair to non-union workers."

"Only now," Wilson said in a statement, "are the unions exempted in a deal hand-crafted by Barack Obama."

"It is up to Senators and Congressmen of right-to-work states to stop this tax on non-union health benefits dead in its tracks," Wilson said, concluding, "There is too much at stake. 92 percent of workers not in unions must not be forced to subsidize the other 8 percent who receive union health benefits."

Say "No" to Black Genocide By Abortion

Click image to enlarge.

Image by Jeremix

Ironic, isn't it, that President Obama is a promoter of Planned Parenthood? The organization began as a eugenics project with the aim of slowing or reversing the growth of the black population. Fortunately, the black community is awakening to the fact that Planned Parenthood abortion clinics are contributing to the genocide of African-Americans. "One in two, or 50% of all African-American children are killed by abortion before they are born." (Rep. Trent Franks)

"Maafa21: Black Genocide in 21st Century America" - video trailer

Abortion and Black Genocide Video

Website: Abortion and The Black Community (Warning: some links within this site are horrifically graphic)

Wednesday, January 13, 2010

Frosties Protest Global Warming

frosties protest global warmingfrosties protest global warming

The Mini Ice Age Starts Here
By David Rose
Last updated at 11:17 AM on 10th January 2010

The bitter winter afflicting much of the Northern Hemisphere is only the start of a global trend towards cooler weather that is likely to last for 20 or 30 years, say some of the world’s most eminent climate scientists.

Their predictions – based on an analysis of natural cycles in water temperatures in the Pacific and Atlantic oceans – challenge some of the global warming orthodoxy’s most deeply cherished beliefs, such as the claim that the North Pole will be free of ice in summer by 2013.

According to the US National Snow and Ice Data Centre in Colorado, Arctic summer sea ice has increased by 409,000 square miles, or 26 per cent, since 2007 – and even the most committed global warming activists do not dispute this.

Monday, January 11, 2010

Sexual Depravity Breeds Savage Jihadists

After the 9/11 tragedy, everyone was searching for answers as to why the terrorists attacked us. The question continues to plague us because of a growing network of individual terrorists and terrorist cells in the U.S.

Rather than rehashing the usual opinions, I chose to research the role of sexual repression, because women in Muslim cultures are in every sense of the word kept under wraps. The idea seemed logical to a Westerner like me, and also because the underwear bomber, Abdulmutallab, spoke of his sexual torments. When I started my research, however, I did not realize that I would discover sexual depravity in the holier-than-thou Middle East. Westerners have been somewhat ignorant about sexual mores in the Middle East, and I include myself in that group.

Now I'm completely convinced that the root of the terrorist problem is sexual obsession, rather than repression, and this depravity is fueled by the Qur’an and the Hadith.

What I have learned is shocking, so readers are warned that if you follow the links within this article, you must do so with full knowledge that what you read and see will very likely be offensive, and in some cases, gruesome, but this may be the only way for you to understand the devil we face. I might add, the same Islamo-fascist devil that some believe should rule the world.

By now we all know that imams inspire jihadists to become martyrs with a promise of sexual paradise, but the details of that promise aren’t widely known to Westerners. Mohammed is claimed to have said, “The smallest reward for the people of Heaven is an abode where there are eighty thousand servants and seventy two wives, over which stands a dome decorated with pearls, aquamarine and ruby, as wide as the distance from al-Jabiyyah to San'a.”

Mohammed Atta reminded himself of these promises in a letter to himself penned just before 9/11. He wrote, “Read al-Tawba and Anfal and reflect on their meanings and remember all of the things God has promised for the martyrs. . . Know that the gardens of paradise are waiting for you in all their beauty, and the women of paradise are waiting, calling out, 'Come hither, friend of God.' They have dressed in their most beautiful clothing.”

Various sources even describe the womens’ physical attributes. While nothing is said about their souls, which seem not to exist, the virgins (or houris) will have wide and beautiful eyes, be eternally young, hairless except for the eyebrows and the head, white(?!), 60 cubits tall and 7 cubits wide, voluptuous, and will have other sexual attributes I’m not inclined to mention here. To ensure eternal happiness, the martyrs also believe:
. . . "Each time we sleep with a houri we find her virgin. Besides, the penis of the Elected never softens. The erection is eternal; the sensation that you feel each time you make love is utterly delicious and out of this world and were you to experience it in this world you would faint. . .
Perhaps this promise of endurance is made to them because they are also offered prepubescent boys for sexual pleasure. You don’t hear that in the news, do you?

Apparently, pederasty is common in the Middle East, even though some claim it doesn't exist any more. Westerners may wonder why pederasty is permitted in an Islamist society where homosexuality is forbidden. This is one answer:
If there is no beard. It is not a man. Therefore it is not homosexuality, and totally within the rights of a Muslim man to take little boys, sodomize them and use them in the manner that Allah has pre-ordained.

Similarly, an encyclopedic explanation says:
Islam has been another force shaping the ways in which same-sex love is understood and practiced in the Middle East. The valorization of youthful male beauty is found in the Qur'an itself: "And there shall wait on them [the Muslim men] young boys of their own, as fair as virgin pearls." (Qur’an 52:24; 56:17; 76:19). Islamic jurisprudence generally considers that attraction towards beautiful youths is normal and natural. The Hanbalite jurist Ibn al-Jawzi (d. 1200) is reputed to have said that "He who claims that he experiences no desire when looking at beautiful boys or youths is a liar, and if we could believe him he would be an animal, and not a human being." (James T. Monroe, in Homoeroticism in Classical Arabic Literature, p. 117) However, anal intercourse (liwat), is proscribed and men are advised to be even more wary of attraction to beautiful boys than to beautiful women, through religious injunctions exhorting them to resist this temptation. It is related that the Prophet Muhammad enjoined his followers to "Beware of beardless youth for they are a greater source of mischief than young maidens." (Murray and Roscoe, 1997, passim)

Stephen Brown wrote about this kind of child abuse in Front Page Magazine:

The Islamists’ interest in boys as sex objects is generally owed to their beliefs and social milieu. Their strict religious convictions do not allow them to be with a woman outside their own families, let alone touch one, before marriage. Moreover, in some Muslim countries, males can’t even catch a glimpse of the demonized female form because of the body-encompassing clothing she is forced to wear. In such a gender segregated environment, homosexual behavior develops, especially towards boys.

Even the Taliban, which executed homosexuals when it ruled Afghanistan, could not eradicate the sexploitation of boys, even in its own ranks. Among the 30 commands it issued to its fighters, Rule No. 19 forbid them from taking young boys without facial hair into their barracks. After the Taliban regime fell, a Fox news report indicated pederasty in Afghanistan returned to its previous place as an accepted social norm.

The consequences of Islamist misogyny, gender segregation and sexual abuse of Muslim boys are far-reaching. Besides growing up to be sexual deviants who collect child pornography and may victimize other children, such sexually traumatized Muslim boys are predisposed to become involved in terrorism as a way of expressing their sexual rage. It therefore comes as no surprise that one anti-terror source told the Times: “A way of finding who the extremists and terrorists are is to go through the child porn sites.”

Child abuse doesn't end with little boys. Westerners are generally aware that arranged marriages are common in Muslim countries. However, most are not aware that marriages in Iran, for example, are permitted with girls from 13 up, but also girls as young as seven ". . . if a physician signs a certificate agreeing to their sexual maturity." As if that isn't bad enough, the Ayatollah Khomeini is claimed to have said that having sex with infants is acceptable. If you followed that link, you will have also learned that Khomeini cited Islamist's teachings on bestiality.

With respect to child pornography, British police have discovered that terrorists are using pornographic images to transmit secret messages. The report says:
It is not clear whether the terrorists were more interested in the material for personal gratification or were drawn to child porn networks as a secure means of sending messages. In one case fewer than a dozen images were found; in another, 40,000.

British security sources confirmed that such a link had been discovered in several cases. They noted the contradiction between people supposedly devoted to theocracy and Islamic fundamentalism and their use of child pornography. “It shows that these people are very confused,” a source said. “Here they are hating Western decadence but actually making use of it and finding that they enjoy this stuff.”

In the previously cited Front Page Magazine article, Brown confirmed:
European security officials first discovered child porn images in a Muslim extremist’s possession when they raided a mosque in Milan, Italy, in 2001. Embedded in the disturbing images, though, they found hidden messages sent by fellow Islamists, causing Italian security agents to believe the terrorists were copying a clandestine method paedophiles use in communicating with one another. At that time, police believed this form of communications camouflage (called steganography) accounted for the child porn’s presence in the mosque.

But other, less doubtful, cases have cropped up since then. When arrested, Abdelkader Ayachine, a suspected Muslim terrorist currently awaiting trial in Spain, possessed almost 40,000 child pornographic movies and images, a number far exceeding any need for encoded communications. Ayachine was connected to the Casablanca bombing terrorist group that killed 45 people in 2003 and stands accused in the Spanish court of inciting jihad and recruiting fighters for the Iraq war. Prosecutors say his child pornography collection consisted mainly of “minors having sex, among themselves and with adults.”

After what we've seen so far, we should no longer be surprised that Islamist paedophiles become jihadists. Unfortunately, the sexual depravity doesn't end with pederasty.

November 2008, terrorists struck in Mumbai, killing nearly 200 people. Less reported to the public was the fact that some victims were said to have been sexually tortured and mutilated. Psychology professor, Dr. David Gutmann, analyzed the terrorist's drive to mutilate this way:
Psychologically speaking, torture and mutilation followed by murder as practiced most recently in Mumbai are the most complex of the shame-dispelling procedures, in that they expunge shame at the cost of incurring guilt: Even the most hardened terrorist will likely feel some qualms of guilt as he mutilates the body of a still living young woman. But for the members of a Shame culture, the feeling of humiliation is the most traumatic, and heavy prices are willingly paid to be rid of it. The aim of torture is to reveal the cowardice and femininity of the foe, and in so doing to export the torturer’s hidden shames onto the enemy, while co-opting his store of courage and hardihood – the masculinity – that he has given up, screamed away, under the knife. The enemy’s terror, castration and invaginated wounds confirm the torturer’s successful projection of his own covert and shameful womanliness and/or homosexuality: “Clearly, he and not me, is actually the woman.” In the murder which – as in Mumbai - follows this projection, the Jihadist kills off the qualities that he despises, now conveniently discovered in the person of the other: “This coward deserves nothing but death.”

Unfortunately, diagnosing the aggravated Shame syndrome will not lead to a cure. The Jihadists, whether in Mumbai or Palestine, can only be killed or jailed.

The Islamist's world is not alone in its depraved sexual practices. We have plenty of our own practitioners in America, which the jihadists seem to be attracted to. However, an important difference between Westerners in the US and Islamic jihadists is that we do not have, as a rule, laws or religious systems that condone physical or sexual abuse of any kind, especially of children. Certainly, Christians are horrified at the very concept. In contrast, polygamy, honor killings, pederasty, child sex abuse of all kinds, bestiality, and sadism are sanctioned to one degree or another by the Qur'an, the Hadith, and the Islamist imams who interpret their sacred texts. Sadly, this perpetuates barbarism, and creates an unending supply of terrorists for the future.

Psychiatrists should be taking a lead on this issue, and educating our leaders, the media, and the public. Until Westerners fully understand the evil we face, and look for pragmatic solutions, we will be in perpetual danger.