Friday, May 7, 2010

Movie of the Century: Obama As 'The New Manchurian Candidate'

How many times have you watched a suspenseful movie, and believed that you fully understood the main plot, only to discover a surprise subplot at the end of the movie that proved you wrong?  Damn it!  Why didn’t I see that subplot coming?  With that thought in mind, I would like you to consider the possibility that the falderal surrounding President Obama’s eligibility to serve as President resembles such a movie with a subplot twist. 

In the opening scene of the Presidential campaign, Democratic Sen. Barack Obama decides for inexplicable reasons to put his personal documents under lock and key.  No one is allowed to view his passport records, nor his elementary school records, nor his college records, and especially not his doctor-endorsed birth certificate from the hospital.  No, indeed, the public is expected to vote for a blank-slate candidate.

The plot thickens during the opening scenes of the movie when Obama makes a contradictory promise to run the most transparent White House in history.  Human nature being what it is, conservative elements of the American citizenry become apoplectic at this dichotomy.  How can Obama claim transparency when he keeps his personal information secret?  Little do these citizens realize that this element of the plot is a deliberate smokescreen to divert attention from the more damning subplot, which has yet to be revealed.

This smokescreen becomes a raging fire when the left-wing media and motivated bloggers get involved in the action scenes.  We all know how the media loves conflict.  It’s their bread and butter.  It’s what keeps their juices flowing.  We know how shallow their reporting can be. And we also know that most of the media are Democrats.  So, their role in this movie is to use the bully pulpit to ridicule contrarians with pejorative labels, and to misuse citizenship terms to confuse the issue.  Throughout Obama’s movie, the media, unwittingly or perhaps willing, aids and abet’s the motives of their beloved protagonist, Barack Obama.  With the fire of outrage blowing in only one direction, all eyes are focused on the birth certificate firestorm alone -- not on the hidden subplot.

Because of the movie’s intense focus on birth certificates and other documents, the audience is deliberately encouraged to think about documents which may actually be irrelevant to Obama’s eligibility to serve.  By doing this, our protagonist is “faking out” the audience.

So far in the movie, Obama et al have been quite effective at hiding the most damning subplot, which is that Barack Obama fails to meet the definition of the term “natural born Citizen” since he holds dual citizenship with the U.K. through his father.  Our Founding Fathers fought mightily to prevent anyone with dual allegiances from becoming Commander-in-Chief.  Several investigators (here, here, here, here, as well as numerous others) have attempted to educate the public, but the media’s campaign to support their hero has successfully muted and marginalized those voices.  Even some conservative pundits have swallowed the false premise of the movie.

As a university lecturer who taught constitutional issues, our protagonist, Barack Obama, knows full well that he does not qualify for the Presidency.  Thus, he lit a match to create a conflagration about his birth certificate, intending to divert the audience’s attention away from the damning subplot.  This subplot is Obama's Achilles Heel.  I believe it can and should result in his impeachment.  Furthermore, I think that those who abetted this crime should also be indicted, whether they are Democrats or Republicans.

Below is a table listing five types of citizenship cited within the U.S. Constitution.  The table was created by M Publius Goat.  After viewing these, how do you think this movie should end? You can cast your vote in the sidebar of this website.

Citizenship Terms Used in the U.S. Constitution - The 5 Terms Defined & Some Legal Reference to Same


  1. My name is Eric Pearson, and I'm a Democratic Party candidate for the U.S. Congress in the 5th district, Tennessee. As such, I do not agree with President Obama and our Democratic Party representatives in Washington.

    I know the National Democratic Party has abandoned many of its older principles and ideals, and as a Democrat I’m extremely dissatisfied with the 'Change We Can Believe In' politicians and their obsession with making our Nation more like the Europe our founding fathers had left behind.

    Already most Democrats know their pleas to the Democratic Party are only being answered by repeated insult and injury. Many of our elected officials are no longer thinking of themselves as being our representatives, but instead refer to themselves as leaders in the true form of tyrants.

    To all intents and purposes the elected representatives within the National Democratic Party are no longer following in the time-honored footsteps laid down by the founding fathers of our great Nation. In fact, we as democrats see our elected representatives within the Democratic Party abandoning the principles and values as set forth within the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the United States.

    They no longer bothering with letting sound arguments and good reasoning rule the day when they can steal from others to finance their own success, and never mind the truth when our political elite can gain power by lying and manipulation. Pushing and pulling data just like the Republicans, these Democratic Party hucksters press their agenda of fear all the same to their own desired outcomes as well.

    Many of us are now ashamed to be Democrats. More than that, we have come to fear our own Democratic Party. Hatred and corruption - the roots of socialism - are on the march as they have never been before, and leading this march is our Democratic Party. Increasingly, mainstream Democrats are uncomfortable with what they are seeing in our party. All the more, we know it is dangerous.

    As Democrats we find ourselves marching in a parade with people Harry Truman or even Jack Kennedy would not recognize - socialist (also know as progressives). Strangely, without meaning to, we the mainstream Democrats find ourselves representing this "socialist movement." However, for the socialist within our Democratic Party, there is nothing so strange about it. Socialists have always sought to leverage corruption for the sake of power.

    As a result, our Democratic Party has already lost the equivalent of every member we have acquired over the past seven years or more, and many of them are now supporting the tea party. More importantly, a recent Newsweek cover declared, "We are all socialists now."

    Furthermore, without doubt a large majority of our Democratic Party representatives in Washington are tainted by corruption, and the liberals among us are supporting the ideologies of progressives with their agendas based on moving our Nation deeper into a socialist form of government. This is a real threat to everything we hold sacred in America, and they are gaining evermore control over our Democratic Party, our Nation, and the American people.

    Meanwhile our middle-class families are looking for more than empty promises. They want to go back to work. And they want our Democratic Party representatives who run Washington to stop pursuing a big government, big spending agenda that includes a government takeover of health care, stimulus bills, a new national energy tax and taxpayer-funded bailouts.

    Thank you, and God bless America.

    Eric Pearson, Democratic Party candidate for US Congress in the 5th district, Tennessee.


  2. Eric,

    Thanks for your reply, but your comments beg the obvious question. Under the circumstances you describe, why are you a Democrat?

  3. Mr. Pearson, if you really believe all the things you so elegantly talk about above, then why don't you ask and push for Obama, to open up his records so we can put a stop to this nonsense?

  4. I agree with everything you have written here and had done my due diligence several years ago on bo//bs.

    Unfortunately, the one item I disagree with you on is impeachment.

    Our founding fathers implemented this two step jewel in our constitution to prevent the likes of Johnson, Nixon, and Clinton (to name a few) to continue on as head of state. But as history has pointed out impeachment is actually a failed statue. Just look at how Johnson and Clinton were impeached but never removed.

    In the case of obama/soetoro impeachment will never work no matter what.

    Do I sound like a defeatist? No not really.

    The constitution was set up to remove an eligibly sitting president not one that has never or could never be eligible.

    So if we ever get to the point of uncovering all the lies and deceit our country will be in a similar situation as was Nicaragua where the congress must legislate his removal and the courts order the military to take action and remove.

    This will probably be the actual plot that enables this usurper to stay in office until he can accomplish his mission of destroying the United States of America.

  5. I agree with you, YR, that an ineligible President is ineligible for impeachment and that a legislative solution must be found.

    However, SCOTUS must first resolve the question of his eligibility, and I'm afraid the Justices have not - and will not - step up to the plate.

  6. Erica,

    It's true, fact is stranger than fiction. The "Manchurian Candidate" theme has been floating around even before Obama formally announced his candidacy.

    If I told you how I think this movie should end I would be hauled away by the Secret Service.
    Secret Service.

  7. I saw the CNN, Anderson Cooper, interview of Lakin last night. I fear that his attorney will not discuss the real issue of Obama's dual citizenship at birth. This aspect of the argument should have been stated first and with clarity. Also he was confronted with the Dual citizen issue during the Libby interview, to which he did not respond correctly in my opinion. Last night again the issue was centered on birthplace. Hopefully Lakin is not a plant, put there to further obscure the real constitutional violation that is already admitted by Obama--OBAMA Sr. WASN'T A US CITIZEN WHEN OBAMA 2 WAS BORN.

  8. [edited - pls delete previous post]


    It's true, fact is stranger than fiction. The "Obama/Manchurian Candidate" theme has been floating around even before Obama formally announced his candidacy.

    If I told you how I think this movie should end I would be hauled away by the Secret Service.

  9. dualer,

    I don't think Lakin is a plant, his service to our country shows he is an honorable man, unlike our cowardly Communist in Chief.

    Lakin is not a legal professional. I too am worried about the competence of Lakin's attorney. He must be educated on the eligibility issue.

    Vattel "primer": "The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children;"

  10. Erica,

    Maybe he's a DINO ;^)

  11. Unless Republicans take over the House and Senate in 2010.

  12. The Republicans will not save us, even if they controlled the Senate and House with super majorities. There are too many liberals lurking in the Republican Party, and as much as I would like to throw ALL the bums out, it won't happen.

    Will a "new and improved" Republican Congress offer more false promises like Gingrich's Contract with America?

    And who will lead this movement? Give me a name. Romney (RINO), Palin (RINO)? Give me another name, and I bet he or she is CFR. The "banksters" and globalists are calling the shots on both sides of the aisle.

    Solution? A Second Revolution will fail, the feds are prepared and too powerful.The States must exercise their Tenth Amendment rights, and failing that, secede.

  13. Why did you delete my post about how I wanted the movie to end? I submitted a duplicate post and asked that the original one with a typo be deleted.

    If you continue to censor me I will not return.

  14. IONU, I think lakin may be being used here. would like to know HOW he hired this particular attorney.

  15. Don't know how he ended up with this attorney. Instead of infighting and trying to hog the spotlight, attorneys should get together, pro bono, and form a "Save America" dream team. I'm sure people would make donations.

    Where's big mouth Donofrio? How about Apuzzo? I'm sure Orly Taitz would do it.