Forty-million
Americans are on food stamps, 26 million more than in 2007 before
Obama was elected. The cost to government is $77 million, and FBI
Reports show there is a huge increase on abuse of the system; along
with abuse of other programs like Medicare by medical practitioners.
Presently there are 70 programs that provide cash, food, housing, medical care, and
social services to low-income persons. The total cost is almost $1
trillion.
Adjusted for inflation, welfare spending is 13 times higher today than it was in 1965, when Washington launched the War on Poverty [President Lyndon Johnson]. Yet the proportion of people living in poverty remains essentially unchanged.
History
and statistics show that poverty declined by 12% for ten years and
rose 15% when the Democrats declared 'War on Poverty'. The Founders
recognized that there was a need, an obligation to help people help
themselves when tragedy caused people to fall into economic ruin or
became too ill to work.
John
Locke wrote:
The law of nature teaches not only self-preservation but also preservation of others, when one's own preservation comes into competition.
In
the early days of the American Republic, local governments assumed
that responsibility, not the federal, central government. Indeed, the
federal government paid attention to the limitations prescribed in
the articles of the Constitution.
But
the Founders also saw the danger of being overly generous when it
comes to welfare policy. Once the people got a taste of what
government, those that operated it, had to offer – their behavior
became increasingly irresponsible to the point that welfare was not
just for emergency situations but a right.
The
TANF (Temporary Assistance for Needy Families) encourages people to
get back on track and become self-reliant; while the other 69 social programs encourage irresponsible behavior.
People
have been caught selling their food share cards on Facebook
and then falsely reporting cards to be lost. Lottery winners who won millions of dollars continued to use food share
cards, as well as prison inmates.
Benjamin Franklin
noticed while living in Europe in the 1760s that:
...in different countries ...the more public provisions were made for the poor, the less they provided for themselves, and of course became poorer. And, on the contrary, the less was done for them, the more they did for themselves, and became richer.
Thomas Jefferson
wrote:
They are not to do anything they please to provide for the general welfare, but only to lay taxes for that purpose. To consider the latter phrase not as describing the purpose of the first, but as giving a distinct and independent power to do any act they please which may be good for the Union, would render all the preceding and subsequent enumerations of power completely useless.
Society
began to make it a habit, in choosing candidates for office, to elect
government officials who promised to provide more 'free stuff'. The
reality is that nothing in life is free – it costs somebody
something.
Among a people generally corrupt liberty cannot long exist.
I
realize that the economy and the unemployment rate determine how many
citizens must resort to social programs, but the system has been
plagued with abuse and outright fraud – which elevates the total
cost even more.
The
Democrat Party began establishing that our form of government was a
democracy when Woodrow
Wilson
was president -incorporated into school textbooks. That was not what
the Founding architects of our government system had in mind.
Alexander Fraser Tytler,
a Scottish lawyer and professor (1747-1813), wrote:
A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the majority discovers it can vote itself largess out of the public treasury. After that, the majority always votes for the candidate promising the most benefits with the result the democracy collapses because of the loose fiscal policy ensuing, always to be followed by a dictatorship, then a monarchy.
To take from one, because it is thought that his own industry and that of his fathers has acquired too much, in order to spare to others, who, or whose fathers have not exercised equal industry and skill, is to violate arbitrarily the first principle of association, “the guarantee to every one of a free exercise of his industry, and the fruits acquired by it.” If the overgrown wealth of an individual be deemed dangerous to the State, the best corrective is the law of equal inheritance to all in equal degree; and the better, as this enforces a law of nature, while extra taxation violates it. [Writings of Thomas Jefferson, 14:466]
Thomas
Jefferson wrote and believed that a government that took from the
wealthy and distributed it to the poor was not only wrong, but
criminal. The Democrat Party in its zeal to adopt socialism has been
redistributing wealth and income for decades, the most obvious being
the income tax system that Congress has refused to dissolve and
replace it with a consumption flat-rate tax. In that way, everyone
pays the same tax rate and those that can afford to purchase more
will automatically pay more in taxes. Frankly, this was a tax system
that the Founders generally approved. According to their writings,
the Founders would have shot down the idea of income tax, especially
being forced from wages and salaries before people had the
opportunity to decide how to spend or invest it.
Milton Friedman
had a method to solve that problem. Government should not ever be in
the business of using taxpayer funding for charity, that is where
private organizations like the Salvation
Army
and churches play a part. Neighbors in a community can also be of
help, if they can.
In
this, our society has degraded by allowing our government, those we
elect, to ignore constitutional law and the intent of the Founders.
The
welfare system is not only inefficient, but selective. Congress will
approve funding for other nations and its people, but will make cuts
of benefits for veterans who served their country by congressional
approval. The government will cut its own national defense measures
and armed forces capabilities, but continue to arm and support other
nations.
We
are protecting the border between North and South Korea, while our
southern border is unsecured and allowing the invasion of illegal
aliens in the millions. The only reason why those we elect are not
taking our national security is strictly political. The same goes for
the amnesty of illegal alien invader lawbreakers – it is a quest
for more votes of a given political party. Those same invaders are
provided the same welfare benefits afforded legal citizens, which
makes it more costly and more insane. Politicians claim that it is
humane, but reality and facts show it is insane and a path towards
self-destruction.
Many
Americans are speaking out and saying that our government requires
reform, and they are correct; but they also must realize that our
society must also reform itself in order for that to become a
reality.
Yup. I keep hoping for an election next year; but I keep praying that martial law and dictatorship won't happen instead.
ReplyDelete