![]()  | 
| Texas' coal-powered energy plants | 
By J. E. Dyer
HotAir.com
June 19, 2011
The necessary precondition for  Texas’s unique economic success – a beacon in a deep recession – is  energy.  And the EPA is closing in for the kill.
 This would be one thing if Texas were  an outlier among the 50 states in terms of dirty air or an otherwise  demonstrably imperiled environment.  But the truth is closer to the  opposite:  the air in Texas has been getting cleaner; in the urban  areas, much cleaner.  And in spite of being by far the largest electric  power producer of the 50 states, and heavily reliant on coal, Texas has  been steadily reducing  its emissions of the EPA’s least-favored compounds from coal combustion  (e.g., sulfur dioxide and nitrous oxide). Its emissions of NOx and SO2  are substantially lower than the national average; Texas is ranked the  11th lowest in NOx emissions (.098 lb/mmBtu in 2009, versus a national  average of .159 lb/mmBtu), and 24th in SO2 (.309 lb/mmBtu in 2009,  versus a national average of .458 lb/mmBtu).
 But the EPA isn’t really making the  argument that Texas is an environmental pigsty.  It’s not putting any  data or findings behind that premise, at any rate.  Instead, it is  simply acting high-handedly, assuming an authority that nothing in  written law confers on it, to pronounce Texas’s procedures in violation  of EPA rules – even when there is no basis for making that claim.  To  put it bluntly, the EPA is making a power grab.

No comments:
Post a Comment