tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2900607157435934187.post4620958080445121062..comments2023-11-03T11:03:34.233-05:00Comments on Jefferson's Rebels: Can Our Constitution Survive?Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2900607157435934187.post-21252551637072268302012-03-03T15:03:48.398-06:002012-03-03T15:03:48.398-06:00The Constitution is Graeco-Masonic anti-Catholic t...The Constitution is Graeco-Masonic anti-Catholic that is why it allows contraceptions and abortions. It was not until the Ellis Island offspring put forth the New Deal that we began to be freed of its oppression. If we bilingually translate it into Spanish, we will further make it better. The Ohio public schools were originally run by the Catholic Church. We must join with the anti-Federalists to return to private ordering of things. We don't need the Constitution, it is Judaic Deuteronomy Law, not natural law like Roman, the law of the Second Charlemagne, Napoleon, which should rule the earth, starting with our great Fourth Empire of the EU at Brussels. Prussia is Great because Prussians are really Lithuanians, so it is just that Merkel should be the Fourth Charlemagne to rule the world together with China and Islam. Is must blessings Brzezinski for Sineurabia Code uniting Roma, Mecca and Pekino against arrogant, aggressive Greeks, Jews and Hindus. Algis Petreikishttp://www.facebook.com/people/Algis-Petreikis/1247297388noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2900607157435934187.post-62459663125606070962012-02-09T09:40:23.090-06:002012-02-09T09:40:23.090-06:00I'm sorry, the author of this article is what ...I'm sorry, the author of this article is what scares the pants off me!<br /><br />How in the world can anyone who supports Newt, also support Paul? The two couldn't be further apart on ideologies. One is conservative one day and totally liberal the next. You never know which way Newt will go on any given topic. You know where Paul stands and he has never wavered (to my knowledge).<br /><br />To think Paul has an isolationist foreign policy agenda, is absurd. This author needs to go back and either REALLY listen to Paul or re-read what Paul believes with regards to foreign policy. Perhaps the author feels we need to continue to be the world police - I don't. I think trying to be the world police and thinking we know what is best for every nation, playing god by 'installing' dictators then assassinating them when they get out of hand, and then expecting the world to continue to love and respect is us naive at best. <br /><br />I support Israel, but I don't think we need to be anything more than an ally. If Iran attacks, then we 'support', we 'assist' - but we don't fight their war for them. Who do we think we are. We can't even get our own nation under control, yet we want to be out there telling other nations how to run their business? <br /><br />On the one hand, the author says we need to stop sending foreign aid; stop buying friends, then he turns right around and says that once we get ourselves righted, we should go right back to these tactics? Huh? There was a time and place where foreign aid was not only needed to these nations, but helped us as a nation. That time has passed, but our stupid politicians are so busy being corrupt they would prefer the status quo rather than legitimately take care of the The Peoples business by keeping their eye on the ball and ending outdated policies and redirecting out going monies that no longer accomplish the intended goal. I think if we have learned anything, sending tens of thousands of dollars to nations in the name of Democracy/Nation Building only gets us corrupted leaders turned Dictators with a repressed populace in those nations. It accomplishes zero for the US and only serves to foster US resentment among those nation's peoples.<br /><br />As far as terrorism. We need to stop being afraid of our shadows and swiftly and skillfully take care of the problem. If attacked, we need to immediately respond with a devastating blow to those responsible. Then we need NOT to rebuild the area or people that attacked us. It might not be the most humane and I'm sure there would be civilian casualties, but life was never intended to be fair. Such action would reinstate a respectable fear of the US and we would again be looked at as a nation not to be messed with. Terrorism might continue around the world, but I'll guarantee it would stop being a threat on our soil. They continue to poke and prod us today, because they know there will be almost no response and if there is, it will be incompetent and usually directed at the wrong party. We have become a joke to other nations and to our own people! Bush started it and Obama has continued it.<br /><br />I read an interesting take on a blog the other day - There is but one small difference between Bush and Obama regarding their governance.<br /><br />Bush said - I'm going to do it my way.<br />Obama says - I'm not doing what you think I'm doing - (while he does it it his way.)<br />They both trampled the Constitution. We allowed it and are continuing to do so.Rita Hoeffnerhttp://www.facebook.com/people/Rita-Hoeffner/100000575072046noreply@blogger.com